{"id":"W2101951822","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00551.x","title":"Why voice melody alone cannot explain neonates’ preference for speech","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Developmental Science","topic":"Infant Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Active listening; Preference; Perception; Melody; Utterance; Human voice; Fundamental frequency; Motor theory of speech perception; Natural (archaeology); Harmonic; Speech perception; Speech recognition; Communication; Acoustics; Musical; Computer science; Physics; Mathematics; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003679552,0.0006322128,0.0008840903,0.0007759584,0.0004201917,0.001570138,0.001579577,0.002009723,0.003189233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01795053,0.000445766,0.0007052657,0.0002990065,0.002462469,0.00323204,0.0014525,0.001760225,0.00100043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003400093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003380486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001714244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001242257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988814,0.0002240169,0.0001139832,0.0003871098,0.0002478891,0.0001455977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947991,0.00290103,0.000866945,0.0005656807,0.0004985197,0.0003687266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004614459,0.0002430856,0.4671513,0.003469013,0.00104676,0.01274905,0.01916182,0.002643928,0.1340989,0.06490855,0.0139349,0.2759782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002037933,0.002100699,0.672982,0.002156705,0.0007431148,0.01776171,0.01571997,0.01052195,0.03515331,0.2014262,0.04062207,0.0006084238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8822563,0.02792258,0.03298166,0.0322368,0.002203235,0.00007465243,0.0009929595,0.0004354345,0.02089633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832033,0.004354514,0.005283352,0.00437064,0.000336798,0.00006835148,0.0002169055,0.0001547755,0.00201129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003679552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01945961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09284799429519315,"score_gpt":0.4096689629846909,"score_spread":0.3168209686894978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}