{"id":"W2102056582","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.005","title":"Options for maintaining forest productivity after natural disturbance: A principal–agent approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Profitability index; Forest management; Silviculture; Economic rent; Business; Principal (computer security); Mountain pine beetle; Agroforestry; Forester; Natural resource economics; Natural resource; Regeneration (biology); Environmental resource management; Forestry; Economics; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Computer science; Microeconomics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003352564,0.0001932856,0.0001648361,0.00006778204,0.0002229772,0.00007227321,0.0001576302,0.00006153993,0.00007728773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005539226,0.0001796197,0.00008309231,0.00009646249,0.00022191,0.0006399328,0.0002959858,0.000102777,0.0001567618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002183597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001281712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004461382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005717995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987956,0.00001853427,0.0001949009,0.0003050484,0.00005085097,0.0006350561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994245,0.00003458334,0.00008503236,0.0002718786,0.000003337457,0.0001807323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001189006,0.0001733445,0.7791001,0.00005170483,0.00004121668,3.088905e-7,0.001465796,0.009977349,0.000004306698,0.2034584,0.003151728,0.002456866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004754355,0.00005854989,0.6701022,0.00000593767,0.00003309687,0.00001182686,0.00004097964,0.01948868,0.000007941078,0.006153882,0.3032441,0.0003773306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983941,0.0001017473,0.0003153633,0.0005656175,0.0001951204,0.0006042935,0.00003793796,0.00003574176,0.01420315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889555,0.0000454504,0.002386115,0.0003635561,0.001048396,0.0003324387,0.00004910515,0.00002555182,0.006793874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3000924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7324678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01588534780257389,"score_gpt":0.2381316110314378,"score_spread":0.2222462632288639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}