{"id":"W2102061966","doi":"10.1080/01431160410001705042","title":"Associations between Woodland Caribou telemetry data and Landsat TM spectral reflectance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Remote Sensing","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Pacific Forest Industries; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Thematic Mapper; Habitat; Remote sensing; Woodland; Geography; Land cover; Environmental science; Ecology; Satellite imagery; Land use","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003988242,0.00006593775,0.0001191625,0.00005630867,0.00008072924,0.0000446894,0.0002478568,0.00005481808,0.00002384117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002432917,0.00006180296,0.00002674548,0.0000857232,0.00005741286,0.0003609342,0.000124015,0.0001938198,0.00001156009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002294068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003487351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002439185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007259559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999155,0.00003272278,0.0002708171,0.0001265533,0.0003054426,0.0001093949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994287,0.00008719194,0.0002791539,0.0001055853,0.0000479818,0.00005135004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004272293,0.00002228949,0.9054976,0.000001222651,0.0002004734,0.0001900152,0.0004708446,0.0005782627,0.00141035,0.00003745094,0.001302178,0.09024666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007757572,0.00004762809,0.9874848,0.00004341453,0.00004184728,0.0003963451,0.00004096202,0.001239799,0.0003562221,0.006958821,0.002510508,0.0001039039],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811126,0.00003247303,0.01174175,0.005722643,0.000368876,0.00002902833,0.00003091797,0.00000722212,0.0009544704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697084,0.00003720355,0.02933179,0.0004249286,0.0004229033,3.338952e-9,0.00003503772,0.000005436956,0.00003434044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09014275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2520252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02592975763192784,"score_gpt":0.2904943905951602,"score_spread":0.2645646329632324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}