{"id":"W2102070657","doi":"10.1190/1.3046455","title":"A visual data-mining methodology for seismic facies analysis: Part 1 — Testing and comparison with other unsupervised clustering methods","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysics","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"ConocoPhillips (Canada); Université de Montréal; McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Cluster analysis; Computer science; Data mining; Pattern recognition (psychology); Unsupervised learning; Partition (number theory); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005550819,0.0009056786,0.0006624685,0.003492353,0.0004490091,0.0008867115,0.001337439,0.0007424693,0.0007726041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01500707,0.0002186001,0.001025511,0.00198973,0.0006313628,0.001177444,0.001234255,0.0004433642,0.0002130598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005686927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007631232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004264975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00273121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970105,0.001484024,0.0002176259,0.0004118512,0.0007787324,0.00009731922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875595,0.008023722,0.0006533182,0.00127004,0.002211817,0.0002816365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002512466,0.002549896,0.04490365,0.0008990579,0.0009182357,0.000147215,0.0006412386,0.2249469,0.02438144,0.004662803,0.003189371,0.6902478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001604727,0.0009819743,0.01248403,0.00002810691,0.00006658468,0.0001385936,0.000284124,0.9656893,0.01669443,0.002503857,0.0009224042,0.00004619299],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5867158,0.000331164,0.4074852,0.0002130258,0.00007907306,0.0005327315,0.0009822476,0.001888429,0.001772298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7235395,0.00008371013,0.2743601,0.00003726607,0.00002036748,0.0002836061,0.001137069,0.0001155642,0.0004229022],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005550819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02935588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2344927660496599,"score_gpt":0.4381798834007329,"score_spread":0.203687117351073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}