{"id":"W2102159062","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpr057","title":"Evaluating the profitability of selection cuts in irregular boreal forests: an approach based on Monte Carlo simulations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Profitability index; Monte Carlo method; Taiga; Boreal; Computer science; Environmental science; Statistics; Mathematics; Forestry; Economics; Geography; Finance; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003488718,0.0007117792,0.001080741,0.001653449,0.0006953782,0.001394098,0.0009996498,0.001341591,0.001653384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009614818,0.0005725038,0.0007068507,0.001175,0.0006283868,0.0009823743,0.0004647694,0.000711631,0.00008490199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003304443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002001461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04468417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03675906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991977,0.0004703223,0.00003068236,0.00007604423,0.0001157888,0.0001094554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833913,0.0150824,0.0006558188,0.0001838736,0.0004418561,0.0002448124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007277141,0.00002957975,0.002327523,0.00001096541,0.00002151734,0.00001876753,0.00001098285,0.9948146,0.00007986776,0.0009047187,0.00004689474,0.001661799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009020907,0.00003229353,0.0006438151,0.000003894279,0.000009843937,0.000006920799,0.00001527001,0.9985775,0.00006423107,0.0005818271,0.00005004315,0.000005438807],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9236718,0.0005181158,0.06934234,0.0002395351,0.0000234339,0.0001904226,0.0003272072,0.0001263468,0.005560758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814988,0.0001619026,0.01747358,0.00002934175,0.000008928412,0.0001097073,0.0001471992,0.00001865504,0.0005518848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04468417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08884817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1594873528611216,"score_gpt":0.4306774280668493,"score_spread":0.2711900752057277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}