{"id":"W2102159062","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpr057","title":"Evaluating the profitability of selection cuts in irregular boreal forests: an approach based on Monte Carlo simulations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Profitability index; Monte Carlo method; Taiga; Boreal; Computer science; Environmental science; Statistics; Mathematics; Forestry; Economics; Geography; Finance; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003719499,0.0001491151,0.0001738313,0.0004290562,0.0001651712,0.00006689262,0.001236455,0.00009208523,0.0005743806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006284019,0.0001077361,0.0001075167,0.0005909638,0.0004468203,0.0009793302,0.0001585259,0.0006079521,0.00001328249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003537058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001336861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003433512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001234307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962193,0.0005825339,0.0006318756,0.0002740299,0.001928442,0.000363803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985628,0.0002119409,0.0003096954,0.0003768119,0.0003975245,0.0001412928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006387261,0.0006162863,0.6910116,0.000008734887,0.00001890657,0.000006962705,0.0006589987,0.3040086,0.00003229828,0.001572936,0.0001268907,0.001299072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004489105,0.00106784,0.5833195,0.0000272744,0.000006620171,0.000007083016,0.00007812617,0.4115638,0.00008131426,0.003287384,0.00005086547,0.00006131676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991345,0.000004394177,0.0002136271,0.0001565187,0.000135577,0.000425397,0.00001334318,0.000008279352,0.007697789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966095,0.000002611288,0.002887348,0.00003445625,0.0001939814,0.00002419806,0.00001833554,0.00001775826,0.0002118134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1076921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6289065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1594873528611216,"score_gpt":0.4306774280668493,"score_spread":0.2711900752057277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}