{"id":"W2102189742","doi":"10.1109/tr.2007.896747","title":"A Computational Model for Determining the Optimal Preventive Maintenance Policy With Random Breakdowns and Imperfect Repairs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Operations research; Reliability engineering; Variable (mathematics); Imperfect; Computer science; Decision model; Optimal decision; Random variable; Operations management; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Decision tree","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008338661,0.0007286935,0.001235567,0.0005658552,0.0005949833,0.001581391,0.002252831,0.001735591,0.005930277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004168065,0.000772638,0.0008404264,0.0006712618,0.0009330959,0.001310275,0.0009262894,0.00129733,0.0004417658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001669706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003189865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02308382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0169007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995987,0.0001168772,0.00002055695,0.00008359305,0.0000850959,0.00009521913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972799,0.00212666,0.0001964686,0.0001043913,0.0001845223,0.0001079907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002141684,0.00001300409,0.0001575093,0.00001267131,0.000004020308,0.00002595544,0.000007289515,0.9950536,0.00005894962,0.003598221,0.0001593211,0.0008879664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005387803,0.000003287877,0.0000152039,0.000001004274,0.000001200627,0.000002321984,0.000002694247,0.9988721,0.00002407185,0.001005558,0.00006594809,0.000001173943],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1873276,0.0003642127,0.7900125,0.001830035,0.0001120005,0.0002271349,0.001491102,0.0008207824,0.01781468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8027859,0.0002885295,0.1881259,0.0002099522,0.00006275961,0.0005948427,0.0008704808,0.0001056252,0.006956157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02308382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04589891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005919531378681124,"score_gpt":0.2277041981147242,"score_spread":0.2217846667360431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}