{"id":"W2102226572","doi":"10.1136/qshc.2009.032862","title":"Checking it twice: an evaluation of checklists for detecting medication errors at the bedside using a chemotherapy model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Quality & Safety","topic":"Patient Safety and Medication Errors","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"Canadian Patient Safety Institute","keywords":"Checklist; Usability; Medicine; Fidelity; Workflow; Protocol (science); Matching (statistics); Concordance; Identification (biology); Medical physics; Computer science; Medical emergency; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Internal medicine; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02100063,0.001389183,0.001060612,0.001141074,0.0007043177,0.0009340575,0.002012679,0.001233547,0.001748889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1242329,0.001007996,0.001343967,0.0005134817,0.0006735117,0.001914643,0.001212405,0.0009557155,0.0004586107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001865293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003277861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003363152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004964673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9809481,0.01230144,0.002397846,0.0007756256,0.003125577,0.0004515296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8940943,0.06815968,0.01060886,0.006268332,0.0154627,0.005406052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04826051,0.05446216,0.1016755,0.007629942,0.001159658,0.0005820929,0.01760822,0.009829716,0.01284644,0.0002710149,0.007653146,0.7380216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02392809,0.4782668,0.3925131,0.003198706,0.001773423,0.001744372,0.007757748,0.05310138,0.01891826,0.0004528421,0.01708214,0.001263108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869612,0.0003105248,0.006758018,0.0001956279,0.00009046988,0.004246699,0.000212366,0.0004682627,0.0007569231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333199,0.0005654991,0.05843067,0.0003548062,0.00006292361,0.005624187,0.0005835257,0.00009451322,0.0009639218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02100063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1110632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3598986076459719,"score_gpt":0.580286802518905,"score_spread":0.220388194872933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}