{"id":"W2102343517","doi":"10.1080/01944360508976404","title":"Gross Density and New Urbanism: Comparing Conventional and New Urbanist Suburbs in Markham, Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Planning Association","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Urbanism; Geography; New Urbanism; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Population density; Differential (mechanical device); Smart growth; Boundary (topology); Land use; Transport engineering; Population; Regional science; Economic geography; Architecture; Civil engineering; Archaeology; Sociology; Demography; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001740461,0.00009915462,0.0001646322,0.0008589989,0.001275557,0.0008079369,0.0004551482,0.00009855998,0.001981716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009754453,0.0001522046,0.0001642667,0.001552642,0.0008778032,0.0002449331,0.0007199651,0.0001637797,0.0001615078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0144399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005857961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9782803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996313,0.00002742348,0.00001225329,0.00003781698,0.0001790042,0.0001121976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992908,0.00004994373,0.000128055,0.00002965334,0.0002919075,0.0002096283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008309557,0.00002095712,0.9800199,0.00003325172,0.00002388795,0.0001569877,0.008218892,0.0003693221,0.0004544716,0.001089328,0.001632377,0.007897442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002441374,0.00001005595,0.995065,0.000005379772,0.000003102946,0.00002543497,0.002851295,0.0001219949,0.00005706612,0.00002983068,0.001825311,0.000003066363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950879,0.0001213539,0.00007886497,0.0001188486,0.000003674488,0.00001179817,0.0006201646,0.00000547846,0.00395183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982474,0.00007023687,0.00005782372,0.000009774928,0.000002155741,0.000005456571,0.0002549386,0.000002279784,0.001350037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02171969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1047693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03188486416565462,"score_gpt":0.293251144141001,"score_spread":0.2613662799753464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}