{"id":"W2102343517","doi":"10.1080/01944360508976404","title":"Gross Density and New Urbanism: Comparing Conventional and New Urbanist Suburbs in Markham, Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Planning Association","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Urbanism; Geography; New Urbanism; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Population density; Differential (mechanical device); Smart growth; Boundary (topology); Land use; Transport engineering; Population; Regional science; Economic geography; Architecture; Civil engineering; Archaeology; Sociology; Demography; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001132711,0.00007868378,0.0002613366,0.00005277853,0.0002645298,0.000124884,0.0001474585,0.00004320661,0.00001951086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001781994,0.00006684849,0.00006596196,0.0001762553,0.0001093333,0.0003483719,0.0000236782,0.0003162565,7.406156e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008293222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004529462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06524166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1365015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988329,0.0001365882,0.0003273353,0.0001096055,0.0004049095,0.0001886935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986874,0.000154389,0.0009087597,0.00005434329,0.00006369721,0.0001314394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005450861,0.00002158624,0.9889596,0.000001523507,0.00002444995,0.000002563631,0.00660975,0.0000539228,0.00004296134,0.00008138316,0.00347097,0.0006768018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004684238,0.00002515962,0.9934809,0.00004452531,0.00003461858,0.000002985866,0.0005513485,0.00005404631,0.00001737313,0.0007190011,0.004526669,0.00007496641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952447,0.0001835683,0.0001205659,0.003445463,0.0001587865,0.00005850327,8.212533e-7,0.00000730695,0.0007802475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958284,0.00001260372,0.0005996774,0.0002218031,0.0003720526,1.788297e-7,9.951787e-7,0.000004158273,0.002960083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0712598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.940983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03188486416565462,"score_gpt":0.293251144141001,"score_spread":0.2613662799753464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}