{"id":"W2102372409","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2015-0086","title":"Citation classics published in <i>Knowledge Management</i> journals. Part II: studying research trends and discovering the Google Scholar Effect","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publish or perish; Originality; Citation impact; Reputation; Publication; Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Publishing; Business; Advertising; Qualitative research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006988451,0.0004042938,0.0007488436,0.04252435,0.001360911,0.0056334,0.0007195093,0.0008301059,0.00391604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05557763,0.0002604974,0.0006800797,0.07029337,0.001112274,0.004141271,0.001601004,0.0006222335,0.001425668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002701391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002764935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003512168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007386455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942912,0.0006326475,0.0009784396,0.0007343968,0.00304397,0.0003193867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9104834,0.03591584,0.02868637,0.003722151,0.01827599,0.002916283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006118463,0.0001017631,0.5260471,0.008844286,0.0006424397,0.0007746062,0.0132305,0.0008423312,0.004531896,0.0227542,0.06217966,0.3594395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003915816,0.0002968824,0.8030383,0.002133944,0.0004018422,0.0016525,0.009796433,0.001509337,0.003707958,0.009715873,0.1676006,0.000107313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8756511,0.05041332,0.003594921,0.007326466,0.002543812,0.0003639916,0.02595796,0.0005839786,0.03356455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952419,0.01581026,0.007264399,0.0007836144,0.002057549,0.0002850443,0.0110772,0.0002072549,0.01009559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03695887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1557059683560485,"score_gpt":0.4152134829267831,"score_spread":0.2595075145707346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}