{"id":"W2102424700","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.11.002","title":"We are, therefore they aren’t: Ingroup construal as a standard of comparison for outgroup judgments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Ingroups and outgroups; Psychology; Construal level theory; Social psychology; In-group favoritism; Trait; Social identity theory; Social group","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02677408,0.0003823236,0.0008214614,0.001320138,0.003373658,0.004071305,0.00154668,0.001987471,0.007518597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1390391,0.0005892501,0.000508116,0.0008443707,0.006621989,0.01422151,0.003910956,0.004257772,0.001241979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000932796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009357927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001662107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001892695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870796,0.007183427,0.0006132423,0.001591435,0.003098336,0.0004339634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9498329,0.0210077,0.005581143,0.01215016,0.008297311,0.00313075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008254421,0.001457266,0.1078724,0.000691618,0.00120717,0.0003581459,0.06321354,0.001730995,0.02724098,0.3647399,0.0429066,0.3803269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005589318,0.001338318,0.2142877,0.0004621281,0.0004470129,0.0006214095,0.02673327,0.01091105,0.01339241,0.6927359,0.03813581,0.0003760756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8479249,0.001748172,0.04835144,0.02815436,0.003194603,0.0002176132,0.0002841535,0.0003034473,0.06982117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887594,0.0001117637,0.007855373,0.001390852,0.0002374581,0.00009847653,0.00009592947,0.0001568413,0.001293832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02677408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1415966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07478763889354875,"score_gpt":0.4628498517002071,"score_spread":0.3880622128066584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}