{"id":"W2102433557","doi":"10.7202/1000619ar","title":"Building a Law of Human Rights: Roncarelli v. Duplessis in Canadian Constitutional Culture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Charter; Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003551314,0.0003400075,0.0003142252,0.001627786,0.03105254,0.01094285,0.001471157,0.004278335,0.003256629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006846293,0.00032749,0.0002471044,0.00177249,0.02175242,0.003202841,0.003201071,0.006832725,0.0002141769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1188651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1248558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964031,0.0006212668,0.00005114906,0.0003450664,0.001275057,0.001304306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973996,0.001151759,0.0001263503,0.00009342397,0.0007213722,0.0005075491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005058135,0.00001855376,0.003433049,0.00007504768,0.000009934179,0.0009584205,0.08034517,0.0003267581,0.0007603816,0.839895,0.05347318,0.02065399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004825917,0.00003869458,0.01934555,0.0004556065,0.00007811111,0.0003373417,0.1368217,0.001094773,0.001749132,0.06412442,0.7756389,0.0002675648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1742896,0.01516385,0.002137182,0.2583551,0.0008163527,0.00007847486,0.0002230879,0.00009241423,0.5488438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436088,0.003300531,0.0007282507,0.02119691,0.0001294412,0.00001770936,0.00003612883,0.00003728937,0.03094493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1188651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8624306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06625086608774737,"score_gpt":0.3300691755282883,"score_spread":0.263818309440541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}