{"id":"W2102482069","doi":"10.1109/mper.2001.4311382","title":"On a Nonlinear Multiple-Centralitycorrections Interior-Point Method for Optimal Power Flow","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Power Engineering Review","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Interior point method; Nonlinear system; Nonlinear programming; Mathematical optimization; Linear programming; Predictor–corrector method; Logarithm; Computer science; Power flow; Set (abstract data type); Algorithm; Power (physics); Mathematics; Electric power system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001012453,0.0007296956,0.0008812122,0.0003934156,0.0003546402,0.0004517587,0.0008597423,0.0006756081,0.002433395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003394589,0.0002533148,0.0003868055,0.0006822431,0.0008131225,0.0006619008,0.000804588,0.001277686,0.000649502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004850291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00127101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004547333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003507799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997408,0.0001198173,0.000006135049,0.00002883407,0.00008851173,0.00001590311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992598,0.0004878586,0.00004415847,0.00004910591,0.0001364474,0.0000227179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059849,0.00003754241,0.0001957637,0.00007909726,0.00001179897,0.00006488103,0.00005279385,0.9106229,0.001727529,0.0248144,0.001263218,0.06107027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007158142,0.000008483359,0.00001697429,0.0000031977,0.000001285408,0.000005296351,0.000002137058,0.9964809,0.0002165121,0.002773751,0.0004820624,0.000002094718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004545651,0.0001073301,0.9933195,0.0001116185,0.00002778394,0.00003186274,0.00001670526,0.0001325004,0.001707032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2243037,0.0004279315,0.7666496,0.0001010552,0.0001161876,0.000302139,0.00009700918,0.0002427292,0.007759687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004547333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009041727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01190189026274857,"score_gpt":0.2690646886621708,"score_spread":0.2571627983994222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}