{"id":"W2102482069","doi":"10.1109/mper.2001.4311382","title":"On a Nonlinear Multiple-Centralitycorrections Interior-Point Method for Optimal Power Flow","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Power Engineering Review","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Interior point method; Nonlinear system; Nonlinear programming; Mathematical optimization; Linear programming; Predictor–corrector method; Logarithm; Computer science; Power flow; Set (abstract data type); Algorithm; Power (physics); Mathematics; Electric power system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004803351,0.0004975563,0.0006337049,0.000143174,0.00006282853,0.00005903605,0.0002686718,0.0001452716,0.0002981348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004916886,0.0005096347,0.0004263328,0.0004560635,0.00001566336,0.0002170411,0.00002658593,0.000407767,0.0001944383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003304931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002122446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003176753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002104248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979934,0.00003234438,0.0006360463,0.000426124,0.0002278355,0.0006842759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987317,0.0003059949,0.00005754854,0.0005473596,0.0001211667,0.0002361695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001110473,0.0002698051,0.00005529308,0.004109736,0.000474298,0.0000559358,0.0002098693,0.9046894,0.01053982,0.0003702422,0.06301387,0.01610073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006116894,0.0002300782,0.0000831658,0.002763872,0.0001110534,0.0001049396,0.000007730359,0.6914188,0.001975036,0.000006770158,0.301983,0.0007038783],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.006077822,0.008820559,0.9772721,0.0002355243,0.004226839,0.00142649,0.0002694995,0.001176869,0.0004942998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4207814,0.01659896,0.5566065,0.001459745,0.0009573548,0.002002205,0.000521822,0.0007948948,0.0002771874],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4206657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01190189026274857,"score_gpt":0.2690646886621708,"score_spread":0.2571627983994222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}