{"id":"W2102494754","doi":"10.3402/tellusb.v55i2.16711","title":"Spatial distribution of carbon sources and sinks in Canada’s forests","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tellus B","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service; University of Saskatchewan; University of Toronto","funders":"University of East Anglia; National Center for Atmospheric Research","keywords":"Environmental science; Carbon sink; Sink (geography); Ecosystem; Carbon cycle; Atmospheric sciences; Physical geography; Spatial distribution; Climate change; Primary production; Remote sensing; Ecology; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004920351,0.00006021367,0.00007506744,0.000001253763,0.00001822403,0.000001815769,0.00004130462,0.00002611666,0.0001146091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009071356,0.00005698032,0.000007860737,0.00004495207,0.00009476714,0.00002198373,0.00003547901,0.00004670469,0.000001537583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003602029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002418361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9027983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9245337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995269,0.00001711521,0.0001010205,0.0001081482,0.0001208183,0.0001260459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998422,0.00001162065,0.00003332091,0.00007163761,4.337765e-7,0.00004074547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004390246,0.00001289517,0.9812422,0.000002200262,0.000001074959,0.000003563738,0.00007000746,0.01462738,0.0001368497,0.0000269747,0.00001321365,0.003859258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001612229,0.00001879096,0.9882232,0.000003080195,0.00000319938,0.000003232853,0.000117693,0.01008998,0.0003680201,0.0001394983,0.0008024035,0.00006968796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963187,0.00003986372,0.0008158131,0.00001764886,0.00002845228,0.00005743423,0.000002032363,0.000002771579,0.002717288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996456,0.00001473349,0.0002001748,0.00001706095,0.000002791797,0.000001393297,0.000002993577,0.000004114663,0.0001111619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02173535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.232359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003253539720678288,"score_gpt":0.1587296321479095,"score_spread":0.1554760924272312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}