{"id":"W2102531573","doi":"10.1017/s026626711300028x","title":"MEASURING GROUP FITNESS IN A BIOLOGICAL HIERARCHY: AN AXIOMATIC SOCIAL CHOICE APPROACH","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Hierarchy; Multicellular organism; Axiomatic system; Group (periodic table); Mathematical economics; Soma; Social choice theory; Inclusive fitness; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Biology; Economics; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004551743,0.00007265098,0.0001202986,0.00004989371,0.0003920997,0.00008612415,0.0001176971,0.00009074224,0.00006352627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002337321,0.00007132171,0.00002381755,0.00007109222,0.0001920099,0.0004699458,0.00002546113,0.00008175414,0.00002025577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005003943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002565908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004011658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001951682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992627,0.0002087667,0.0001474229,0.0001863392,0.00003551717,0.0001592586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997611,0.00005503815,0.00003966893,0.00005957824,0.00001640685,0.00006820623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008303491,0.00007897073,0.004008039,0.000005770482,0.000004835335,1.584298e-7,0.003486926,0.00004781979,0.00003765503,0.9891368,0.000006231267,0.003178514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003528096,0.00006228373,0.04969253,0.000005882419,0.000002856129,0.000001011845,0.0008153608,0.004017028,0.000003059573,0.9434547,0.001383946,0.000208519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639171,0.00006547473,0.00004117587,0.001618863,0.00005791851,0.0001976615,0.000002770911,0.0000222014,0.03407683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988149,0.00008402298,0.0001935799,0.0002163345,0.0005873458,0.00005370113,0.00001569253,0.00000494572,0.0000294397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04568449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3015754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08556689064692381,"score_gpt":0.2648938256307335,"score_spread":0.1793269349838097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}