{"id":"W2102565133","doi":"10.1109/vtc.2002.1002889","title":"Analytical level crossing rates and average fade durations for diversity techniques in Nakagami fading channels","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fading; Nakagami distribution; Fade; Level crossing; Maximal-ratio combining; Envelope (radar); Diversity combining; Statistics; Mathematics; Algorithm; Diversity gain; Diversity scheme; Telecommunications; Channel (broadcasting); Diversity (politics); Computer science; Physics; Acoustics; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001631891,0.0001115956,0.0001421549,0.0001474693,0.0002847448,0.00007763145,0.0001132549,0.00007723056,0.0000111412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092175,0.0001204184,0.0000274614,0.000167255,0.00007154432,0.0003166334,0.0000840256,0.0001253357,7.3758e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008609693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009307828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001445998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002840623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994392,0.00002130884,0.0001768793,0.0001302592,0.00005519332,0.0001771857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995802,0.000139217,0.00001985104,0.0001834625,0.00003694811,0.00004029523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006126797,0.0003909231,0.06294759,0.0008108832,0.0002209712,0.00002450797,0.01174508,0.07986579,0.1280357,0.6289739,0.00297711,0.08394626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005259337,0.00004103874,0.004216041,0.0001168872,0.00001332434,0.00001091639,0.000352144,0.2639723,0.7051902,0.02076613,0.004181532,0.000613563],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08040785,0.0001009932,0.9152728,0.00006355815,0.00002349583,0.0003155664,0.000009517655,0.0006367881,0.003169411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9050745,0.0000929016,0.09457859,0.00003141526,0.000007209581,0.00004637471,0.000005288874,0.00001623978,0.0001474358],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8246667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4910519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05443712689375561,"score_gpt":0.3063232482602496,"score_spread":0.251886121366494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}