{"id":"W2102565133","doi":"10.1109/vtc.2002.1002889","title":"Analytical level crossing rates and average fade durations for diversity techniques in Nakagami fading channels","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fading; Nakagami distribution; Fade; Level crossing; Maximal-ratio combining; Envelope (radar); Diversity combining; Statistics; Mathematics; Algorithm; Diversity gain; Diversity scheme; Telecommunications; Channel (broadcasting); Diversity (politics); Computer science; Physics; Acoustics; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002079692,0.001343733,0.0008105561,0.001803431,0.0005151274,0.001567681,0.001198464,0.0008928819,0.003658381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01022071,0.0004961509,0.00101989,0.001589343,0.0009679016,0.001755647,0.0007338927,0.001370847,0.001551795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001693898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009872909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001478935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00161124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993588,0.0001602762,0.00004570443,0.0000675004,0.0002715062,0.00009619027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969303,0.001855167,0.0004995964,0.0002184061,0.0004471187,0.00004946744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003346367,0.00003676927,0.0006392851,0.0002475901,0.00004058255,0.0003099036,0.0004289919,0.8029892,0.00789473,0.157013,0.001257675,0.02910881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005533468,0.00003697003,0.000282047,0.00007129294,0.00003205326,0.0003492801,0.00006297498,0.9676119,0.002744916,0.02654516,0.00222818,0.00002967361],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01168254,0.001571293,0.9802971,0.00009581912,0.00003973773,0.00004527461,0.00007538026,0.0002286129,0.005964265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6234704,0.01023674,0.3534772,0.0002649937,0.0002058484,0.0003501405,0.0002963298,0.0003783091,0.01131998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003658381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01229018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05443712689375561,"score_gpt":0.3063232482602496,"score_spread":0.251886121366494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}