{"id":"W2102583691","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2012.01252.x","title":"Identifying Priority Areas for Forest Landscape Restoration to Protect Ridgelines and Hillsides: A Cost‐Benefit Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reforestation; Liberian dollar; Payment; Easement; Business; Cost–benefit analysis; Equity (law); Afforestation; Direct Payments; Natural resource economics; Forestry; Geography; Environmental planning; Finance; Economics; Ecology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001059527,0.0002983512,0.0008186873,0.000788624,0.0002931636,0.0002374383,0.0002916164,0.0001619164,0.0001832185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001677249,0.0003146149,0.0003434062,0.00021572,0.0000571169,0.001234285,0.00002956685,0.0001688416,0.00007547123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001742977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001064653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01477215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5356423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975163,0.00001619511,0.001274739,0.0004145647,0.000008329455,0.0007699076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970151,0.00008867193,0.00103649,0.0002375683,0.00008173304,0.001540421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003431344,0.00002010196,0.9336675,0.00004935127,0.0006577728,0.000002020737,0.002642491,0.01770106,0.00001344066,0.0431192,0.00116119,0.0009315829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006698978,0.0001774442,0.9812778,0.00002727041,0.0001829053,0.00006727233,0.001172323,0.0006910489,0.00002756436,0.004777906,0.01042625,0.0005023209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937153,0.001215992,0.0007036714,0.001642582,0.001010288,0.0007745324,0.0005996426,0.000007420492,0.0003305607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969078,0.000107735,0.001163648,0.0002691994,0.0008883358,0.00008390228,0.0001457515,0.00002828823,0.000405383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5208702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08723329973104861,"score_gpt":0.2010883247737119,"score_spread":0.1138550250426632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}