{"id":"W2102666472","doi":"10.1139/l09-077","title":"Comparison of the annual minimum flow and the deficit below threshold approaches: case study for the province of New Brunswick, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Generalized Pareto distribution; Flow (mathematics); Intensity (physics); Statistics; Truncation (statistics); Environmental science; Statistic; Pareto principle; Series (stratigraphy); Mathematics; Distribution (mathematics); Econometrics; Extreme value theory; Physics; Geology; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001895468,0.0003979459,0.0005123155,0.002731395,0.001444807,0.001734693,0.001403615,0.0003973206,0.0008351735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005556948,0.0003035239,0.000560935,0.006120547,0.0008915038,0.0005190384,0.0007781842,0.0006675571,0.00007527405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02966245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02276797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988061,0.0002202735,0.00005996686,0.0001399603,0.0004352187,0.0003384559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971993,0.00084847,0.0002844508,0.0001448361,0.001285592,0.0002372431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002076627,0.0001094323,0.9119834,0.000163351,0.0001610564,0.001306334,0.001616652,0.04308079,0.001332344,0.002503029,0.001389727,0.03614622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003115494,0.00008154073,0.9044504,0.00005644805,0.00008692456,0.0002959876,0.006925157,0.08350109,0.0009197272,0.0005212684,0.003068219,0.00006208203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939447,0.0002279294,0.00161214,0.0001624196,0.00000393449,0.00008917907,0.000960485,0.00002605839,0.002973196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994169,0.0002221243,0.00343569,0.0000275018,0.000002385578,0.00003118848,0.001030631,0.00001448295,0.001066934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02966245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2152172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01611114615119174,"score_gpt":0.2034137393415083,"score_spread":0.1873025931903166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}