{"id":"W2102692916","doi":"10.1111/1539-6924.00262","title":"Assessing Human Health Response in Life Cycle Assessment Using ED<sub>10</sub>s and DALYs: Part 1—Cancer Effects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Population; Environmental science; Life-cycle assessment; Measure (data warehouse); Risk assessment; Extrapolation; Environmental health; Toxicology; Reliability engineering; Econometrics; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Medicine; Data mining; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001262666,0.0002412747,0.0005608156,0.0002087577,0.0004201464,0.000160278,0.00016169,0.00006588661,0.0008350141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002254307,0.0002097754,0.0001845493,0.001053815,0.0001364481,0.0003170447,0.0001783941,0.0002651315,0.00002999711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003903287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001779947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002577167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005102267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973223,0.0007019738,0.0004622243,0.0006087206,0.0003914686,0.000513324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985629,0.000449191,0.0003278138,0.0003722599,0.000009508343,0.0002783062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003861723,0.0003964971,0.840812,0.00006159564,0.0004165579,0.00003970027,0.0003462654,0.05721356,0.08075191,0.000004313345,0.001138867,0.01878005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007572017,0.00009208889,0.7278867,0.0001096163,0.000719852,0.000001868378,0.0001134851,0.2658705,0.00372704,0.00003959077,0.0002780329,0.0004040134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979497,0.001010897,0.0002165341,0.0002676812,0.00003133261,0.0001754749,0.000007479854,0.00004031052,0.0003005406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977909,0.0009862296,0.0008800974,0.0001863532,0.00005395172,0.00002279196,0.000008130575,0.000022193,0.00004930804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.208657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9142819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01976493017721327,"score_gpt":0.3905917637817612,"score_spread":0.370826833604548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}