{"id":"W2102730640","doi":"10.1111/evo.12001","title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF SEX-RATIO VARIATION IN DIOECIOUS FLOWERING PLANTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Biology; Dioecy; Sex ratio; Biological dispersal; Pollen; Sex allocation; Evolution of sexual reproduction; Seed dispersal; Ecology; Phylogenetic tree; Zoology; Demography; Genetics; Offspring","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009738186,0.00004554384,0.0001072264,0.000009534551,0.00005316356,0.000004166744,0.00003415634,0.00002456072,0.00002449958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009912365,0.00001789723,0.00001957437,0.0001097375,0.00001234654,0.0001231881,0.00001555921,0.00002895539,0.00001138414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002489568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000128782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004909182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001211112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996192,0.00003016626,0.0001040505,0.00006028787,0.0000759439,0.0001103325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998639,0.00005492179,0.00004518427,0.000006741771,0.00001229918,0.00001698016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001422355,0.00004880611,0.1279807,0.000001391661,0.00000751997,1.463797e-7,0.0006007492,0.00003889981,0.8706655,0.0001220024,0.00004843131,0.0004716241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004219814,0.00003803508,0.9886953,0.000008670657,0.000003497658,7.123222e-7,0.0004099511,0.0004329882,0.01015465,0.00006288981,0.0001056305,0.00004551239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984738,0.0004790366,0.00006162785,0.00002338293,0.00003879875,0.0000474422,0.00001514592,0.00001187278,0.0008489046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997897,0.00001436022,0.00002517384,0.000004509591,0.0001229553,0.000002970127,0.00001180835,1.210534e-7,0.00002842585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07421248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1126798835668136,"score_gpt":0.2903335711750633,"score_spread":0.1776536876082497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}