{"id":"W2102779916","doi":"10.1142/s0218195900000218","title":"A COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF SIMPLICIAL MESH IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES AS MEASURED BY SOLUTION EFFICIENCY","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications","topic":"Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Polygon mesh; Mathematical optimization; Laplacian smoothing; Finite element method; Simple (philosophy); Smoothing; Computer science; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Finite volume method; T-vertices; Mathematics; Quality (philosophy); Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Mesh generation; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000797505,0.0002411013,0.000442698,0.001846726,0.000179392,0.000191525,0.001541244,0.0001091355,0.0003336961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005821825,0.0002496295,0.0004387035,0.00338812,0.00009494014,0.0006964761,0.0001190583,0.0002222241,0.00003375433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002618147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003355479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003541288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004354878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960002,0.00006960037,0.001357286,0.0004129162,0.001910678,0.0002493336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953895,0.0003696441,0.0009715501,0.0003036595,0.00278772,0.0001779178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000872633,0.0008865421,0.0001841602,0.000009598394,0.001275861,0.000003918944,0.0001564099,0.2354483,0.005541376,0.03258002,0.001030628,0.7227958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003832329,0.001672742,0.01303542,0.0001326866,0.001589394,0.0004074105,0.0001237968,0.4748152,0.04964468,0.1691481,0.2839077,0.001690567],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03109808,0.0003305166,0.9656661,0.001098234,0.0001994935,0.0005192092,0.0001259826,0.00006406604,0.000898351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417344,0.0001254054,0.05642097,0.0006177025,0.0003663738,0.0001377211,0.0003154156,0.00001484484,0.0002671745],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01340096252291059,"score_gpt":0.3006171013680556,"score_spread":0.2872161388451451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}