{"id":"W2102779916","doi":"10.1142/s0218195900000218","title":"A COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF SIMPLICIAL MESH IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES AS MEASURED BY SOLUTION EFFICIENCY","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications","topic":"Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Polygon mesh; Mathematical optimization; Laplacian smoothing; Finite element method; Simple (philosophy); Smoothing; Computer science; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Finite volume method; T-vertices; Mathematics; Quality (philosophy); Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Mesh generation; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006264396,0.0006815162,0.0007245561,0.001768138,0.0004059658,0.001098201,0.001088606,0.00127536,0.003473408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04043777,0.0003984909,0.0007637747,0.001871382,0.001211791,0.002017643,0.001418209,0.0008108794,0.0005227049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007630061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006583215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005608748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005348606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994737,0.002648798,0.0001593555,0.0001698614,0.001973361,0.0003116111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624194,0.03097848,0.001445589,0.002964068,0.001938709,0.0002538013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009729388,0.0002632999,0.007192868,0.0004519131,0.0001714498,0.0001534333,0.0001603896,0.7284917,0.01491466,0.07232555,0.001094626,0.1738072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001190988,0.0007200385,0.005711152,0.00006886195,0.0001716165,0.0003100158,0.0001190182,0.9501692,0.01251892,0.02745782,0.002594613,0.00003967124],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3855114,0.005631282,0.5745727,0.002632487,0.00008935211,0.0004208546,0.0002119843,0.0005590036,0.03037101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8450884,0.00155275,0.150323,0.0001327668,0.00007257239,0.0002156745,0.0001234218,0.000209576,0.002281892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006264396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03312975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01340096252291059,"score_gpt":0.3006171013680556,"score_spread":0.2872161388451451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}