{"id":"W2102806954","doi":"10.1029/2005jd006697","title":"Using CO<sub>2</sub>:CO correlations to improve inverse analyses of carbon fluxes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Inversion (geology); Covariance; A priori and a posteriori; Inverse; Environmental science; Atmospheric sciences; Mathematics; Meteorology; Statistics; Geology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005183141,0.0001993548,0.0003955564,0.00001536684,0.0001798665,0.00003917563,0.0004109122,0.0001009904,0.000195376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001683124,0.0001663972,0.0002258967,0.0006990116,0.0007084868,0.0002891317,0.0002328764,0.0005291231,0.00009502871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005449751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007431844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004870611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001569628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968612,0.0002036848,0.0006111076,0.0002730983,0.00150741,0.0005435194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987279,0.0002834483,0.0003085041,0.0002867591,0.00006561631,0.0003278125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001281043,0.0003826618,0.04125545,0.000009647146,0.00004619907,0.00003449869,0.00008479028,0.1937285,0.7598525,0.00003500011,0.001562467,0.002880209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001387464,0.002227633,0.5171835,0.0001273049,0.0001575549,0.00003602181,0.00121381,0.1390186,0.3318096,0.005146774,0.0010852,0.0006064645],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940826,0.00004336017,0.002610614,0.00007218579,0.00007310514,0.000190832,0.000005197298,0.000007680571,0.002914419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832833,0.00003409524,0.01601894,0.00003139984,0.0002095358,0.000003671646,0.000001810857,0.00002832534,0.0003889247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4759281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03704131990871608,"score_gpt":0.3323200762228031,"score_spread":0.295278756314087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}