{"id":"W2102882075","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.027","title":"Hydro-climatic analysis of mechanical breakups reconstructed from tree-rings, Necopastic watershed, northern Québec, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Cryospheric studies and observations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"ArcticNet","keywords":"Watershed; Magnitude (astronomy); Flood myth; Breakup; Physical geography; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Scale (ratio); Geology; Climatology; Geography; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003523862,0.000268915,0.0002979721,0.001634283,0.001510483,0.001165399,0.001208524,0.0004936918,0.003648517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001387622,0.0002166296,0.0003616511,0.003288317,0.000521988,0.0003285999,0.0004356445,0.0003702922,0.0004191156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01487346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009974766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997877,0.0000244411,0.00001226902,0.0000549927,0.00003942058,0.00008113075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988981,0.0001210988,0.000108174,0.00004965228,0.0006011838,0.0002217501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002301125,0.0001019342,0.9604114,0.00004704146,0.0001747397,0.0002499041,0.0006497012,0.01880227,0.00186579,0.0004099766,0.004122527,0.01293449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001207453,0.000006200522,0.9858204,0.00001536177,0.00002059708,0.00001711538,0.0005050474,0.01244931,0.00009592477,0.00002725593,0.001016348,0.00001439414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913329,0.0001411922,0.0002218614,0.00009476139,0.000005090881,0.00001621309,0.006589727,0.00004406654,0.001554101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947367,0.00005702102,0.0002872029,0.0000181277,0.00000299265,0.00001033021,0.003988549,0.00001330733,0.00088577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01487346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00865359899763341,"score_gpt":0.187065359520669,"score_spread":0.1784117605230356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}