{"id":"W2102901208","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00201-1","title":"The interrogation as a type of dialogue","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009080056,0.00003816405,0.00009155918,0.00004183029,0.00004480071,0.00004365736,0.0002419666,0.00002355027,0.000005051791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003901731,0.00002290176,0.0000433087,0.0001304178,0.0000120089,0.0002025208,0.00001651426,0.00006934274,0.00001077523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002718265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001125924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003563095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000518585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991708,0.0001266456,0.0003885273,0.00003214235,0.0002229748,0.00005888414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988006,0.000164625,0.000623228,0.000142918,0.000241058,0.00002753305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003710433,0.0003328308,0.002360191,0.0001548712,0.0002180028,0.00002275663,0.02059804,0.00148084,0.01970817,0.9267308,0.008354746,0.02000171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008375735,0.007632005,0.03566535,0.0022577,0.0003253781,0.002728651,0.01109811,0.3237877,0.1344154,0.2039944,0.2683619,0.001357558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3832963,0.0003734608,0.6110126,0.0005906573,0.002220136,0.0001169251,2.691344e-7,0.000007470086,0.002382164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861286,0.00004033366,0.01363841,0.0000321213,0.0000426182,2.950845e-7,9.366683e-8,0.000002290105,0.0001152586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7227363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09339065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02958442364808472,"score_gpt":0.2958388677965046,"score_spread":0.2662544441484199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}