{"id":"W2102954307","doi":"10.1109/59.871738","title":"Contingency ranking for on-line voltage stability assessment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Power System Optimization and Stability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Electric power system; Contingency; Reliability engineering; Ranking (information retrieval); Margin (machine learning); Stability (learning theory); Engineering; Voltage; Blackout; Power (physics); Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Line (geometry); Control theory (sociology); Control (management); Electrical engineering; Mathematics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009566584,0.0007071812,0.0007977457,0.002348539,0.0005020696,0.0009247693,0.0004003509,0.0003443578,0.004727409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065098,0.0002012988,0.000261144,0.001102177,0.0002392474,0.0007759087,0.0004018959,0.0004930054,0.000737065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004089967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005296264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002888746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004324035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979613,0.001228038,0.00005776389,0.00009363557,0.0005495056,0.00010972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975989,0.001400159,0.0002014133,0.0002317152,0.00045214,0.0001156147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005637333,0.0002415006,0.006514404,0.0001600555,0.00009991548,0.0001991194,0.00009164362,0.3470937,0.006914751,0.01333268,0.01135765,0.6134307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000218935,0.0001738243,0.002246046,0.00001087642,0.00001753189,0.00008876352,0.00002875821,0.9897133,0.002002314,0.00450545,0.001167007,0.0000243075],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1634778,0.0007767873,0.8215516,0.0002060407,0.000116076,0.000226811,0.0004897105,0.002612399,0.01054276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8122591,0.000192788,0.1852297,0.00003937447,0.00007974043,0.00008183439,0.0005810381,0.00009773999,0.001438715],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004727409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01581478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02501040230318653,"score_gpt":0.2618697992998376,"score_spread":0.236859396996651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}