{"id":"W2102960304","doi":"10.1177/1098214012464037","title":"Arguments for a Common Set of Principles for Collaborative Inquiry in Evaluation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Logic model; Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Stakeholder; Program evaluation; Management science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Public administration; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3024054,0.002648088,0.005341647,0.009153823,0.01660413,0.03869847,0.0134351,0.02960807,0.007384952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2380435,0.002645942,0.006060009,0.007560718,0.1416953,0.05481188,0.028115,0.03547414,0.003185324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01995035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02732571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004482527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002870991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.653598,0.2366872,0.02336997,0.01930781,0.06143515,0.005601895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6968179,0.2143449,0.01047326,0.04115148,0.03127029,0.005942136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009428871,0.00002103519,0.00005940397,0.0001038433,0.00001253874,0.00001996107,0.002033072,0.0002359699,0.00002057937,0.9940954,0.0009130957,0.002475625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005020612,0.00002049205,0.00005358454,0.0002900191,0.00000860828,0.00004477476,0.0007774134,0.000804695,0.00008450032,0.98588,0.01196606,0.00001973255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002909262,0.002639645,0.7886564,0.1185515,0.0009607204,0.001240571,0.00009607198,0.0003470665,0.08459885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2712866,0.002130514,0.6895554,0.02131657,0.001014092,0.008652979,0.0001595166,0.0003917677,0.005492499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3024054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8602583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3925397717083799,"score_gpt":0.5662179449091042,"score_spread":0.1736781732007242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}