{"id":"W2103064434","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-246x.2008.03924.x","title":"Assessment of systematic errors in the surface gravity anomalies over North America using the GRACE gravity model","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Journal International","topic":"Geophysics and Gravity Measurements","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Geodesy; Gravimetry; Gravitational field; Gravity of Earth; Satellite; Geology; Surface gravity; Gravity anomaly; Spherical harmonics; Geophysics; Field (mathematics); Surface (topology); Gravity model of trade; Gravitation; Remote sensing; Physics; Geometry; Mathematics; Classical mechanics; Spectral line; Astronomy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005389646,0.0001554543,0.0002846291,0.0000541984,0.0003155043,0.00008476502,0.0007256329,0.00002765971,0.00004395217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004261421,0.0000852178,0.0001876079,0.000276345,0.000185089,0.0002668193,0.00002899213,0.000427453,0.00001034663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002321412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001173771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002179509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006059469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975948,0.000310519,0.0004353101,0.0001617581,0.001260086,0.0002375176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989632,0.0001980082,0.0003854216,0.0002105104,0.0001790133,0.00006381985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002004629,0.0002039038,0.7703127,0.00008545103,0.00008712103,0.00002945261,0.0008667854,0.2277419,0.0001908083,0.0002853811,0.00007369193,0.0001027717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001528134,0.00003837554,0.7454466,0.00008240477,0.00002351202,0.00004855226,0.0001860435,0.2512332,0.00000578342,0.002694086,0.000007806347,0.00008087546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976853,0.00005343131,0.001160069,0.0002970212,0.0002867022,0.0001894221,0.00008028276,0.000003941856,0.0002438718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988615,0.00002494828,0.0007359436,0.0002012318,0.0000982989,0.000001070455,0.00002404444,0.000003278501,0.00004969463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0248661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3475081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05247333036022977,"score_gpt":0.2861425510419517,"score_spread":0.2336692206817219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}