{"id":"W2103188573","doi":"10.1139/f03-169","title":"Size structural change in lightly exploited coral reef fish communities: evidence for weak indirect effects","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government","keywords":"Fishing; Biomass (ecology); Coral reef; Coral; Predation; Ecology; Reef; Community structure; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Coral reef fish; Sample size determination; Relative species abundance; Fishery; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009238467,0.0002809008,0.0004126067,0.0007194648,0.0003854882,0.000780844,0.0005180304,0.0004187378,0.001814992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005084954,0.000338829,0.0003647973,0.0003396016,0.001709831,0.0005748867,0.001568236,0.0005075023,0.0001791685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003986298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003216981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005026935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01487573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993309,0.0001451173,0.00004256307,0.0001681547,0.0001950069,0.0001183025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995051,0.001535127,0.001389291,0.0006743501,0.0004879491,0.0008622981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003250191,0.0001057065,0.9500679,0.00009031162,0.0003199377,0.0001050862,0.0006817147,0.000679723,0.03507191,0.0002967418,0.00007102166,0.01218497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000210429,0.00006498131,0.9991792,0.000001713293,0.00001821461,0.00002912345,0.0000598746,0.0002040032,0.0003323125,0.00006121118,0.00004391688,0.00000322923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991022,0.00007746364,0.0001350652,0.0000227557,6.875796e-7,0.000002665499,0.00003007875,0.000004788149,0.0006241771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996361,0.00004292387,0.0001108816,0.00002075193,0.000003391187,0.00000361919,0.00004675776,0.000003315996,0.0001322924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005026935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009995341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05796535728916295,"score_gpt":0.2585805730955646,"score_spread":0.2006152158064016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}