{"id":"W2103199937","doi":"10.1186/1471-2458-11-940","title":"Adequacy of diabetes care for older U.S. rural adults: a cross-sectional population based study using 2009 BRFSS data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Public Health","topic":"Diabetes Management and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Winnipeg Regional Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Biostatistics; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; Diabetes mellitus; Cross-sectional study; Gerontology; Logistic regression; Environmental health; Public health; Rural area; Health care; Rural health; Population; Multivariate analysis; Demography; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001459542,0.0001844942,0.0002492938,0.0008181651,0.0004238719,0.0005140929,0.0003475916,0.0003235922,0.001341964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003346719,0.0002418528,0.0004956264,0.001339923,0.000178033,0.0006669089,0.0005645232,0.0006617022,0.0003395372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004170656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005230057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02463793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03234509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994691,0.000154077,0.0000941369,0.0001017715,0.0001252903,0.0000555537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980099,0.000244024,0.001078917,0.0001313729,0.0002964309,0.0002392905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001667417,0.00004008587,0.99905,0.00000991736,0.00003456293,0.00001418928,0.0001230675,0.00001398029,0.0000436821,0.000007204987,0.0001584893,0.0004881848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003806579,0.00005773443,0.9991985,0.000009196503,0.0000157052,0.00005911941,0.000379458,0.00006790477,0.00001767477,0.000005184645,0.0001836251,0.000001984664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970742,0.0001216811,0.00009171926,0.0001005174,0.000005126683,0.00003747156,0.00210812,0.000004138732,0.0004570481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979545,0.0001130321,0.0001695408,0.00008747568,0.000005706051,0.00004549732,0.001501299,0.000001842747,0.0001211321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02463793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04898906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1552891033368588,"score_gpt":0.3947164187733244,"score_spread":0.2394273154364656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}