{"id":"W2103253640","doi":"10.1071/sb12009","title":"Morphological and molecular evidence supports the recognition of a new subspecies of the critically endangered Pityrodia scabra (Lamiaceae)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Systematic Botany","topic":"Plant Diversity and Evolution","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Biological Resources Study","keywords":"Subspecies; Disjunct; Biology; Taxon; Critically endangered; Vicariance; Evolutionary biology; Population; Indumentum; Species complex; Phylogenetic tree; Phylogeography; Endangered species; Ecology; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003813201,0.0001018129,0.0002548788,0.000006902212,0.000104654,0.0000435413,0.0002417636,0.00009086696,0.0004054848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000443225,0.00003056693,0.0001017845,0.0001939432,0.0002085149,0.0001635118,0.00007407345,0.00008271058,0.00002974232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001359069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008542982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007911656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001211511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988007,0.0002541365,0.0003372774,0.000154403,0.0002815418,0.0001719704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991746,0.0003519176,0.0001905596,0.0001003441,0.0001140701,0.0000684862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002502623,0.00008731829,0.02398818,0.002414939,0.00006805806,0.00001841856,0.000649984,9.529609e-7,0.9617305,0.000559216,0.009331315,0.001126057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001148941,0.0001704019,0.9736826,0.003977291,0.0001580526,0.0001695359,0.002881028,0.00002322095,0.01609881,0.002490686,0.00006074791,0.0001727219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994826,0.000168956,0.00000711259,0.004074898,0.00006061632,0.0007394975,0.00003115572,0.00001209551,0.00007969803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994242,0.00003017841,0.00008560927,0.0001021237,0.00002505024,0.00001490481,0.000002849968,4.763272e-7,0.000314644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4439774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04785573722209901,"score_gpt":0.216817818213743,"score_spread":0.1689620809916439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}