{"id":"W2103355126","doi":"10.2308/bria-50824","title":"The Effects of Auditors' Accessibility to “Tone at the Top” Knowledge on Audit Judgments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Tone (literature); Psychology; Control (management); Mediation; Mental representation; Quality (philosophy); Quality audit; Audit risk; Representation (politics); Psychological intervention; Process (computing); Accounting; Applied psychology; Cognition; Business; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008012815,0.0002967253,0.0003267545,0.0004061311,0.001261019,0.0007122439,0.001785773,0.0001047672,0.0001199333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02221067,0.0001983307,0.0001161054,0.001926167,0.0003315441,0.0007917898,0.003001363,0.0008633776,0.001092269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004481822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004984618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00156783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001565851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955248,0.0002216167,0.0006152554,0.0007302689,0.001742912,0.00116521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993157,0.001917728,0.00317134,0.001180455,0.0005328185,0.0000406941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001818145,0.0004854916,0.5340795,0.0005581551,0.00001785467,0.00001062705,0.0001929242,0.00005761215,0.003148342,0.003587719,0.03329994,0.42438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007534703,0.00008022754,0.7073678,0.0005758725,0.00002560304,1.67764e-7,0.0001518711,0.0002709885,0.001170313,0.0007958783,0.2885161,0.0002916908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866219,0.00008516581,0.0002712091,0.001445971,0.0012501,0.001399464,0.000001991898,0.00006745381,0.008856817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995075,0.00001131743,0.00002493144,0.0003344954,0.001680319,0.0002784955,0.000006358036,0.00005650011,0.002532508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4240883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04992067035501252,"score_gpt":0.3860201694150232,"score_spread":0.3360994990600106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}