{"id":"W2103414007","doi":"10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2048428","title":"Toward Credible Evaluation of Anomaly-Based Intrusion-Detection Methods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews)","topic":"Network Security and Intrusion Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":280,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Intrusion detection system; Anomaly detection; Anomaly-based intrusion detection system; Variety (cybernetics); Constant false alarm rate; Computer science; Anomaly (physics); Data mining; Field (mathematics); Data science; Mainstream; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002053872,0.000187959,0.0003259497,0.0002095079,0.0003277037,0.0001197396,0.0002135078,0.0001663592,0.00003699288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001164727,0.000162562,0.00009302516,0.0005264733,0.0001165241,0.0001700475,0.000006418253,0.0003024169,0.00001638156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000236312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004999009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006556383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006646986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998108,0.0003913721,0.0005814321,0.0004441642,0.0003113628,0.0001636185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985921,0.0001230124,0.0002809692,0.0006063779,0.000263571,0.0001340094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008677761,0.000160808,0.000006994883,0.0002053547,0.0000221178,1.207013e-7,0.0001813011,0.0009559747,0.01246781,0.004974943,0.00008406614,0.9809318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008084333,0.0003245049,0.0002035281,0.0002357808,0.0002413145,0.000064285,0.00005773908,0.6241766,0.03843293,0.001572355,0.333448,0.0004345349],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01031632,0.002733058,0.983969,0.0001488017,0.0008966768,0.001289141,0.000007473977,0.00007039429,0.0005691104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822419,0.003620183,0.01293776,0.00006649781,0.0001259228,0.0008872,0.000002512909,0.00001315991,0.0001048376],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6629088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04866288168365428,"score_gpt":0.3191304410893022,"score_spread":0.2704675594056479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}