{"id":"W2103414007","doi":"10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2048428","title":"Toward Credible Evaluation of Anomaly-Based Intrusion-Detection Methods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews)","topic":"Network Security and Intrusion Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":280,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Intrusion detection system; Anomaly detection; Anomaly-based intrusion detection system; Variety (cybernetics); Constant false alarm rate; Computer science; Anomaly (physics); Data mining; Field (mathematics); Data science; Mainstream; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08971536,0.001779818,0.002366085,0.008963393,0.001044942,0.006128384,0.004535339,0.003379176,0.001424747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.320644,0.0008369077,0.0008583856,0.003751632,0.002849357,0.008378476,0.003156997,0.003420909,0.000812295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002651736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002958816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009486073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007589032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8949628,0.06095285,0.006384163,0.003687666,0.0332011,0.0008114525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6827347,0.2329387,0.01351862,0.01763046,0.0517207,0.001456796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001434214,0.0008076343,0.04875066,0.004282353,0.0009095899,0.0004291222,0.001059496,0.1055317,0.01074971,0.1515267,0.008340796,0.666178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002804705,0.001495334,0.01142664,0.001816797,0.0003026859,0.0007847648,0.001095002,0.8089262,0.02411246,0.128151,0.0214235,0.0001850702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.07202115,0.02551408,0.8759357,0.00566112,0.0006957893,0.0009852048,0.0004521199,0.001866702,0.01686812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5557848,0.005924137,0.4350782,0.0004956691,0.0003367687,0.0008999196,0.0005037449,0.0001484109,0.0008283173],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9102846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4744658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04866288168365428,"score_gpt":0.3191304410893022,"score_spread":0.2704675594056479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}