{"id":"W2103556695","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2013-101735","title":"A comparison of exposure assessment approaches: lung cancer and occupational asbestos exposure in a population-based case–control study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","topic":"Occupational and environmental lung diseases","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; Public Health Ontario; Cancer Care Ontario; Occupational Cancer Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Asbestos; Environmental health; Lung cancer; Job-exposure matrix; Medicine; Exposure assessment; Population; Logistic regression; Occupational exposure; Risk assessment; Pathology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000168189,0.0002549215,0.0004927177,0.0001747444,0.0001119648,0.000009234015,0.00004345218,0.00008100416,0.001206403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002567305,0.0002016722,0.00004510571,0.0001070515,0.0002043326,0.0001618629,0.00003538552,0.0001573405,0.000002233789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000180662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005019649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001315361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001175872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980966,0.0000805781,0.0006116413,0.0003998901,0.0006239073,0.0001873517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992277,0.0001979969,0.0001870755,0.0001650425,0.00001326154,0.0002088999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004310375,0.001618177,0.9908858,0.0001283919,0.00009716417,0.00003270896,0.0003009441,0.00102825,0.0003645756,0.00003107523,0.00006023228,0.005021675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005581962,0.00103969,0.9690572,0.0001333462,0.0002692566,0.00005356108,0.001673328,0.02197708,0.000009801099,0.00002353825,0.000007990556,0.0001732281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962963,0.001420573,0.00008082372,0.0004279905,0.00004587328,0.001412917,0.0002385191,0.00001265664,0.00006433539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980532,0.00002570633,0.0004408012,0.000284895,0.0001020194,0.0004423209,0.0005818577,0.00001862667,0.0000505569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02182855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0307906235238849,"score_gpt":0.3221241406959761,"score_spread":0.2913335171720912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}