{"id":"W2103556695","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2013-101735","title":"A comparison of exposure assessment approaches: lung cancer and occupational asbestos exposure in a population-based case–control study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","topic":"Occupational and environmental lung diseases","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; Public Health Ontario; Cancer Care Ontario; Occupational Cancer Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Asbestos; Environmental health; Lung cancer; Job-exposure matrix; Medicine; Exposure assessment; Population; Logistic regression; Occupational exposure; Risk assessment; Pathology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0606317,0.0007400453,0.0009645554,0.003063578,0.0006365381,0.001480389,0.001264722,0.001374828,0.0006889947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08226258,0.0005986505,0.001631355,0.001857345,0.000883883,0.001215767,0.001568525,0.000654502,0.0001305579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006470217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000528727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002065673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002471646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9405155,0.04433604,0.00354821,0.004320485,0.006792747,0.0004870419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9497344,0.03524819,0.006136175,0.003822142,0.004488105,0.0005709448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006572343,0.0005085304,0.9662461,0.0005129122,0.007867276,0.0001374446,0.001392346,0.0004360247,0.001295734,0.000258853,0.0001881808,0.0145841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008844542,0.00412291,0.9872458,0.0001523093,0.002845502,0.0004234372,0.0008976608,0.001921857,0.0004446581,0.0002134094,0.0007901012,0.00005798804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870767,0.004674776,0.006531053,0.0001142479,0.00009186273,0.0004590308,0.0002000477,0.0000181855,0.0008340508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941624,0.0008940577,0.003750904,0.00008107061,0.0000612752,0.0005129081,0.0003798698,0.000007970172,0.0001495741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0606317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3206549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0307906235238849,"score_gpt":0.3221241406959761,"score_spread":0.2913335171720912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}