{"id":"W2103589464","doi":"10.1139/l06-062","title":"Seismic hazard analysis: a comparative study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Seismic hazard; Induced seismicity; Seismology; Polygon (computer graphics); Hazard; Geology; Hazard map; Magnitude (astronomy); Seismic risk; Earthquake scenario; Voronoi diagram; Hazard analysis; Mathematics; Computer science; Engineering; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002515551,0.0004773312,0.0004987305,0.009354604,0.0004789025,0.0009860167,0.0008622372,0.0002927328,0.003267679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006499437,0.0001630746,0.000564798,0.007646261,0.0004482068,0.0007255072,0.000518869,0.0002246365,0.000210948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004612293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001835244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1424761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1275772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988096,0.0003115746,0.00004714021,0.00007403744,0.0006743799,0.0000832947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957076,0.00208299,0.0002708222,0.000237427,0.00160394,0.00009709829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001124843,0.0002859402,0.1073544,0.0006914871,0.0003176992,0.0003199263,0.001453882,0.2347556,0.002544949,0.01907536,0.003993307,0.6280827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001135732,0.0008641341,0.3551608,0.0002235858,0.0002766108,0.001071863,0.003977696,0.5911416,0.007412193,0.009761811,0.02983788,0.0001582796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8581771,0.007606798,0.09215218,0.0006805475,0.00004620034,0.0001735404,0.002041668,0.000529659,0.03859229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801996,0.0029212,0.01420798,0.00001543526,0.00002544274,0.00002281144,0.0008967407,0.00004957385,0.001661264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1424761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2832936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008733833298945478,"score_gpt":0.1994406157156776,"score_spread":0.1907067824167321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}