{"id":"W2103646885","doi":"","title":"Effects of range size on species–area relationships","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Relative abundance distribution; Habitat; Biodiversity; Relative species abundance; Body size and species richness; Macroecology; Spatial ecology; Biology; Species distribution; Global biodiversity; Species diversity","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007355488,0.0001162223,0.0001465822,0.00007982145,0.0002616775,0.00001528906,0.0001484165,0.00004897901,0.0001532887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002713571,0.0001228626,0.00006658446,0.0003941714,0.0003046797,0.0003233275,0.00009762243,0.0001547569,0.0001809079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001353437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009515032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001074501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000272431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993074,0.00009669388,0.0001090372,0.0001829167,0.0001250884,0.0001788527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986936,0.0009958583,0.00008221349,0.000148175,0.0000141771,0.00006597522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104878,0.0004441402,0.947706,0.00002631734,0.00008886778,0.0001226539,0.001165423,0.002683415,0.0001600112,0.04570524,0.00147353,0.0003195218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001337954,0.0002951427,0.9484936,0.00002560339,0.0000464909,0.000003741666,0.0006141377,0.0001449159,0.0004697714,0.005422038,0.04282336,0.0003232277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6419855,0.00000650735,0.0003182921,0.0000646209,0.00004548518,0.0001235642,0.00003068018,0.00002495879,0.3574004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817359,0.00001599857,0.00008619233,0.00003319756,0.000001611232,6.077084e-7,0.000006833696,0.000006547848,0.0181131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3397504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5010194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01382577675628706,"score_gpt":0.1806870745394469,"score_spread":0.1668612977831599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}