{"id":"W2103646885","doi":"","title":"Effects of range size on species–area relationships","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Relative abundance distribution; Habitat; Biodiversity; Relative species abundance; Body size and species richness; Macroecology; Spatial ecology; Biology; Species distribution; Global biodiversity; Species diversity","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002400082,0.0003539103,0.0004556685,0.0008814702,0.0003347094,0.001228256,0.0005360058,0.0005995632,0.005243789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01961361,0.0002914806,0.0006622182,0.0008533144,0.001319293,0.002086621,0.001306652,0.00053881,0.0005550169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005316936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002515281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002676559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002701929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984161,0.0008613296,0.00005827842,0.0002889296,0.0002202755,0.0001550609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782048,0.01843577,0.001171351,0.00120366,0.0004144138,0.0005699383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006901287,0.0002811737,0.6092512,0.0002617351,0.0007187066,0.000998571,0.001353399,0.2104262,0.0319938,0.04973659,0.002551484,0.09173698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007518665,0.000438868,0.7467651,0.00005071625,0.0002703421,0.001393435,0.000490539,0.17504,0.003795128,0.06474321,0.006836004,0.000101496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9425657,0.001581396,0.02828606,0.0009383435,0.00003290792,0.00002855285,0.0003400212,0.0002330515,0.02599395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981989,0.000177311,0.0008932956,0.00005045145,0.00001450584,0.000009913789,0.00005774883,0.00003120811,0.0005665972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005243789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01754218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01382577675628706,"score_gpt":0.1806870745394469,"score_spread":0.1668612977831599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}