{"id":"W2103653086","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.025","title":"Epiphytic macrolichen cover, richness and composition in young successional boreal forest: A comparison of fire and logging disturbance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Epiphyte; Lichen; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Logging; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002464826,0.000146501,0.0001271291,0.0005680559,0.0002814471,0.0003435863,0.0001668875,0.0001330979,0.0008050312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004253936,0.0001126085,0.0001506964,0.0003190956,0.0002119545,0.0003355139,0.000236175,0.000127895,0.0001047651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002063945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001232546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009861493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04617864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999011,0.00001707193,0.000009403556,0.00002639615,0.00001505857,0.00003099463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996251,0.00004934035,0.0001260689,0.00001981453,0.0000362163,0.0001433917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002587804,0.00004274117,0.9948943,0.000005751713,0.00003198358,0.00005454066,0.0001828536,0.00004073594,0.002577456,0.00001501893,0.00002431364,0.001871484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.151431e-7,0.00001913667,0.9998129,3.168301e-7,0.000002905155,0.0000408971,0.00005609805,0.00002061657,0.00002929478,0.000001711933,0.00001527011,3.871025e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997999,0.00004210368,0.00001325296,0.00000147605,7.906555e-7,8.149698e-7,0.00004386758,6.704136e-7,0.00009718924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997224,0.00002691519,0.00002502413,0.000003270487,0.000001622318,0.0000010085,0.00009996726,4.798234e-7,0.0001191904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009861493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0196082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01439164489703343,"score_gpt":0.2431075205610658,"score_spread":0.2287158756640323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}