{"id":"W2103766997","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2008.09.002","title":"A comparison of methods for assessing penetrating trauma on retrospective multi-center data","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","topic":"Trauma and Emergency Care Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine","keywords":"Bayesian network; Trauma center; Medical diagnosis; Random forest; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability; Receiver operating characteristic; Computer science; Triage; Penetrating trauma; Machine learning; Medicine; Statistics; Decision tree; Data mining; Retrospective cohort study; Surgery; Emergency medicine; Radiology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1142896,0.002127334,0.002587144,0.01317059,0.00100298,0.004714969,0.003575957,0.002785124,0.001755048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2732688,0.001414734,0.003678179,0.006920207,0.001026537,0.004750628,0.003629787,0.001724598,0.0005408656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002314862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003308637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01182193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01570655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9135086,0.06223203,0.008623014,0.004592183,0.009850412,0.001193694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3935035,0.5588459,0.01208384,0.01263759,0.02144448,0.001484696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01733583,0.001057432,0.5938957,0.00305027,0.01047257,0.0002477559,0.004519602,0.01490645,0.003575108,0.001966475,0.002579466,0.3463935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003075884,0.008630516,0.6596496,0.001823273,0.00751697,0.001952377,0.00761563,0.2882658,0.007101172,0.007314994,0.006330784,0.0007229847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7658633,0.01417024,0.2050435,0.001157356,0.0004342934,0.003200751,0.005591223,0.001239122,0.003300194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7489117,0.00394518,0.238076,0.0003042188,0.0001536916,0.001500119,0.005916525,0.0003867201,0.0008058526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1142896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6044284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3042927391806273,"score_gpt":0.5279180851115948,"score_spread":0.2236253459309674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}