{"id":"W2103942349","doi":"10.33524/cjar.v14i2.84","title":"“HOW, WHEN, WHY” – A COMPARISON OF TWO ACTION RESEARCH METHODS TO EXAMINE THE HIDDEN TONES IN ANNOTATION FEEDBACK","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Action Research","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action research; Participatory action research; Annotation; Tone (literature); Action (physics); Triangulation; Computer science; Process (computing); Citizen journalism; Psychology; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Linguistics; Sociology; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1795958,0.001565349,0.001588921,0.006265198,0.005851533,0.008562159,0.004134145,0.002980269,0.005181912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2185599,0.001417744,0.001588897,0.003873453,0.01346972,0.01107925,0.006902858,0.003506525,0.001075193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007382985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01001545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003072684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00645943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7283458,0.2373035,0.008059667,0.008506563,0.01553202,0.00225242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6000603,0.3443136,0.01292192,0.02121452,0.01872444,0.002765353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001589267,0.002132377,0.008128726,0.006196438,0.0002228684,0.000349356,0.578217,0.000471748,0.00957777,0.040902,0.002186133,0.3500263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003220109,0.009281019,0.05017078,0.01400501,0.00112551,0.002055783,0.576223,0.009269417,0.02930939,0.07893078,0.2252517,0.001157613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4577249,0.005792283,0.4060536,0.006443671,0.001632588,0.01704319,0.0002902578,0.0008203037,0.1041993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6014254,0.002585719,0.3652988,0.001741537,0.0001255637,0.01865657,0.0001424712,0.0004035443,0.009620346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8204042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9498045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7533189870005124,"score_gpt":0.6494167508035116,"score_spread":0.1039022361970008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}