{"id":"W2104086837","doi":"10.1002/hec.1103","title":"A re‐examination of the impact of reference pricing on anti‐hypertensive drug plan expenditures in British Columbia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Economics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Reimbursement; Counterfactual thinking; Context (archaeology); Drug pricing; Drug; Actuarial science; Plan (archaeology); Drug prices; Medicine; Public economics; Business; Economics; Pharmacology; Health care; Economic growth; Geography; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002947038,0.0003584587,0.0009430651,0.001922489,0.001619542,0.002389494,0.001907978,0.0007452203,0.00548515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02045843,0.0003909675,0.0008706768,0.005470859,0.000682498,0.0006152097,0.0009492171,0.001587653,0.0003476471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03928009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02570264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961538,0.0008319544,0.0001991723,0.0003224633,0.001518102,0.0009744921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809391,0.00847442,0.001789956,0.001004209,0.006804246,0.0009880242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001266451,0.0003175272,0.8809321,0.000292268,0.0007181846,0.001504772,0.001284752,0.0215189,0.0009887478,0.008330365,0.02064454,0.06220144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004705305,0.00006500402,0.9816413,0.00005202569,0.0001869482,0.00006954461,0.001139021,0.009760676,0.0005177485,0.0002612315,0.006225105,0.0000343618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766781,0.001222972,0.0003380293,0.003950586,0.00003465813,0.00004469783,0.004833134,0.00004931188,0.01284842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893773,0.0006157767,0.0002159072,0.0004216785,0.00001585044,0.00001651703,0.002447842,0.00001777078,0.006871373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03928009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2849983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0656231207171754,"score_gpt":0.2997996327226722,"score_spread":0.2341765120054968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}