{"id":"W2104098757","doi":"10.1175/2010jas3332.1","title":"Interpreting Stationary Wave Nonlinearity in Barotropic Dynamics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Barotropic fluid; Baroclinity; Rossby wave; Nonlinear system; Physics; Eddy; Stationary state; Forcing (mathematics); Standing wave; Stokes wave; Wavenumber; Mechanics; Transient (computer programming); Wave propagation; Classical mechanics; Breaking wave; Turbulence; Atmospheric sciences; Optics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003619801,0.0004212087,0.0002299432,0.0005299943,0.0004077393,0.00111574,0.0003505696,0.0006295573,0.001446397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002015291,0.0001937947,0.0002883518,0.0002994359,0.0009401978,0.001454646,0.0010438,0.0005626708,0.0002434971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005649062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006381676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006547231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003968386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999137,0.00002823812,0.000004893543,0.000007918492,0.00002757985,0.00001769307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995077,0.0002322854,0.00009877347,0.00005539009,0.00006650134,0.00003943307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001500615,0.00008080863,0.02214505,0.0001458719,0.00005647499,0.001189471,0.0007049926,0.6770102,0.03512264,0.2433755,0.002001479,0.01801757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008760464,0.00002457165,0.003626348,0.00001407666,0.000008743094,0.00008630721,0.0001297486,0.9389787,0.001309202,0.05478851,0.001008878,0.00001598331],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8644422,0.0006373519,0.1113328,0.001522659,0.000134098,0.00005293286,0.0001733456,0.0001708568,0.0215338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921714,0.0003331089,0.00525167,0.00005619111,0.00006487757,0.00001298861,0.0000475915,0.00003146053,0.002030648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006547231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01301825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01177381366022075,"score_gpt":0.246429222624925,"score_spread":0.2346554089647043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}