{"id":"W2104118300","doi":"10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02686.x","title":"Harmonizing recreational fisheries and conservation objectives for aquatic biodiversity in inland waters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Fish Biology","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Fisheries law; Recreation; Fishery; Fisheries management; Biodiversity; Fishing; Fisheries science; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental resource management; Legislation; Recreational fishing; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002997114,0.00004491632,0.0001050284,0.00004468812,0.00009099042,0.000006843628,0.00005598996,0.00005376391,0.00005800716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001896135,0.00003628074,0.00001767176,0.00003900173,0.0002275052,0.0001530767,0.00005293269,0.00009200915,0.000002751161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002145565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005194625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005881806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009196255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996513,0.00002890927,0.0001310271,0.00007450602,0.00002804041,0.00008619024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997094,0.0001271183,0.0001109437,0.00002523034,0.00000959236,0.0000177553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006078183,0.00001919859,0.9725338,0.000003533178,0.00001407129,0.000001537659,0.0002767808,0.000001562811,0.001087473,0.00003835317,0.02541528,0.0005476777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004734282,0.0001359436,0.9822199,0.000003112686,0.00001159623,0.000006776958,0.0001956262,0.00004021968,0.000119943,0.002342616,0.01440908,0.00004180582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876344,0.000004620651,0.0001148554,0.01156232,0.0001827357,0.00008203362,0.00000449152,0.000002195544,0.0004123805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965651,0.0000752992,0.001686045,0.001590507,0.00002269654,0.000003468135,0.000004382192,0.000001192807,0.00005129676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0110062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1479485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02239283278518288,"score_gpt":0.2250204368346567,"score_spread":0.2026276040494738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}