{"id":"W2104145890","doi":"10.1515/jmc.2009.003","title":"One-round secure comparison of integers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Cryptology","topic":"Cryptography and Data Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Predicate (mathematical logic); Extension (predicate logic); Computer science; Common value auction; Proxy (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Theoretical computer science; Encryption; Cryptography; Discrete mathematics; Mathematics; Computer security; Programming language; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005662395,0.0001168313,0.0006423388,0.0002123792,0.00003852174,0.00003950487,0.0009575323,0.0001270941,0.00003795873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002811441,0.00009493074,0.0002197347,0.0003107,0.00007946237,0.0003681274,0.00008231144,0.0003996055,0.00001432937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001692322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000568555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.326257e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.682108e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998274,0.0001101449,0.0008928715,0.0001339858,0.0003682474,0.0002207073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984412,0.0002502318,0.0006048671,0.0003550125,0.0002098895,0.0001388452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003724013,0.0007879832,0.000173911,0.00004292974,0.00004104818,0.00001611216,0.00117653,0.000007257303,0.0009202861,0.9878827,0.001827596,0.007086456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005000434,0.00111782,0.001189903,0.00009767796,0.00003701439,0.0002717714,0.0003635136,0.001970058,0.002424121,0.9912785,0.0006269237,0.000122612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08204827,0.0002985939,0.9123619,0.003400884,0.0001905423,0.00005899131,0.00000173157,0.00001834591,0.001620742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7746815,0.00001039497,0.2250887,0.0001631243,0.00005249507,2.772003e-7,3.860595e-7,0.00000251647,5.752548e-7],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6926333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3871163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03433697848249082,"score_gpt":0.3210987023680869,"score_spread":0.2867617238855961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}