{"id":"W2104155377","doi":"10.1071/wf08132","title":"Assessing crown fire potential in coniferous forests of western North America: a critique of current approaches and recent simulation studies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Crown (dentistry); Fire regime; Vegetation (pathology); Forestry; Fire protection; Canopy; Meteorology; Physical geography; Geography; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Engineering; Civil engineering; Geology; Ecosystem; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01127224,0.0005057144,0.0006674891,0.00120932,0.000542055,0.002957218,0.002047007,0.0007054725,0.0007502796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02132048,0.0003233998,0.0004691634,0.001708865,0.001180115,0.001850923,0.001136027,0.001615331,0.0001397576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002586576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002852369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06092442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09075897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977859,0.00116144,0.0001620533,0.0002528189,0.0005995931,0.00003814753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872689,0.00892291,0.0005027913,0.0007145609,0.002428392,0.0001623071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001712064,0.0002354946,0.08548586,0.001795084,0.0003328735,0.00009779554,0.0027581,0.316907,0.001556197,0.1077917,0.01296165,0.4699071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001174744,0.0002828945,0.03995658,0.00281675,0.0001718093,0.0001673761,0.004260434,0.7559673,0.002682787,0.1289466,0.06445834,0.0001715484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4580097,0.06653097,0.3460402,0.06942917,0.000889056,0.00036146,0.001967283,0.002330063,0.05444211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8205691,0.01923091,0.1538893,0.002334181,0.000298452,0.0001982667,0.0003993887,0.000211119,0.002869334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06092442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1211396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0335234448577342,"score_gpt":0.3214198560096172,"score_spread":0.287896411151883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}