{"id":"W2104155377","doi":"10.1071/wf08132","title":"Assessing crown fire potential in coniferous forests of western North America: a critique of current approaches and recent simulation studies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Crown (dentistry); Fire regime; Vegetation (pathology); Forestry; Fire protection; Canopy; Meteorology; Physical geography; Geography; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Engineering; Civil engineering; Geology; Ecosystem; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002678091,0.0001027015,0.0002609332,0.00006606433,0.00002346157,0.00003404932,0.0001969061,0.0000430971,0.00002046388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001508122,0.00008281412,0.00005035535,0.0000829812,0.0001643529,0.0004747618,0.0000946602,0.0002230065,0.000001054063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006932703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002266339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001591542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008973033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987457,0.00005582713,0.0005439943,0.0001221067,0.0004326942,0.00009971654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990436,0.0001403349,0.0005863507,0.00007273362,0.0001103239,0.00004666119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008373605,0.0001700926,0.8321488,0.00003806453,0.00005186292,0.00002536737,0.000751636,0.02065808,0.0005293238,0.000001553316,0.0000308271,0.1455106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008125491,0.0001496078,0.9339084,0.0002660275,0.00002029053,0.00007883588,0.000192156,0.06375176,0.0001335782,0.00007053281,0.0005166139,0.00009964914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981451,0.0004396215,0.0003997301,0.0002567673,0.0006217602,0.0001075161,0.00001043748,0.000002785533,0.00001627408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994192,0.0002260484,0.0002020034,0.00001615427,0.000119022,0.000002272581,0.000004062983,0.000007407545,0.000003846087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.145411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3377062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0335234448577342,"score_gpt":0.3214198560096172,"score_spread":0.287896411151883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}