{"id":"W2104249103","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2011.6030616","title":"Augmenting spreadsheets with constraint satisfaction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Spreadsheets and End-User Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint programming; Computer science; Constraint satisfaction problem; Constraint satisfaction; USable; Constraint (computer-aided design); Popularity; Usability; Constraint logic programming; Programming language; Interface (matter); Software engineering; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Mathematical optimization; Operating system; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001598085,0.0001230584,0.0001061927,0.00006766235,0.000124266,0.0001106041,0.0003110446,0.00003259454,0.0002124752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007109752,0.00009131378,0.00003049251,0.0001847618,0.0000390825,0.0004702269,0.0001467078,0.00008920863,0.00007572361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002342355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003534927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005715355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000798092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999033,0.00002167945,0.0001593443,0.0003207271,0.0001772033,0.0002880571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994023,0.00002942625,0.0000675197,0.0003655636,0.00004807219,0.0000870802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001479128,0.00009206758,0.17159,0.00001932455,0.00008307191,0.00009147132,0.004642089,0.0001046946,0.001296002,0.3149714,0.0007217552,0.5063734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001496863,0.0005435513,0.8712496,0.0001588779,0.00003145239,0.0005242873,0.0006755712,0.08700889,0.02989308,0.005675298,0.0016133,0.001129207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1820564,0.00001077633,0.6861868,0.0000704406,0.0002562744,0.00008670518,1.881469e-7,0.0004150367,0.1309174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8036656,0.000001037186,0.1960384,0.0001507324,0.00003156262,0.000003460473,2.745963e-7,0.000006471977,0.0001024474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6996596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3723668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03244962478792261,"score_gpt":0.2093826084771256,"score_spread":0.176932983689203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}