{"id":"W2104257901","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0417-1","title":"Characterizing best–worst voting systems in the scoring context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Axiom; Context (archaeology); Social choice theory; Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Cardinal voting systems; Condorcet method; Approval voting; Choice set; Anti-plurality voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009817745,0.0001232643,0.0003040908,0.00008198561,0.0004502652,0.0001996703,0.0001748219,0.00009463563,0.00001289326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000848854,0.0001160447,0.00005936672,0.0001795013,0.00003037443,0.0001954977,0.00001754791,0.0002104227,0.00004514365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003712864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003668312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008102963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005292658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989942,0.00005724478,0.0004027902,0.0002374923,0.00003581968,0.0002724736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995618,0.00006796598,0.0002235331,0.0001036353,0.00001328822,0.00002973706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006471322,0.00004523635,0.1043201,0.000076103,0.00001415912,0.000005036644,0.009095325,0.000004172253,0.00003996657,0.881052,0.0000443246,0.005297076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001297072,0.0001658445,0.8386058,0.0003389501,0.00001631349,0.00002259437,0.02890939,0.0004114318,0.00001153961,0.005967327,0.1235439,0.0007097872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790661,0.002423818,0.00002588232,0.004004046,0.0004117823,0.0002170741,0.00002250795,0.00003099239,0.01379782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998549,0.00001824016,0.000002110985,0.0004903674,0.0007571363,0.0000124485,0.00000547121,0.00001028542,0.000154882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4732165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04292224798241957,"score_gpt":0.2466643740283857,"score_spread":0.2037421260459661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}