{"id":"W2104257901","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0417-1","title":"Characterizing best–worst voting systems in the scoring context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Axiom; Context (archaeology); Social choice theory; Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Cardinal voting systems; Condorcet method; Approval voting; Choice set; Anti-plurality voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01205072,0.0007733997,0.001856792,0.002162545,0.00249198,0.007590552,0.002603024,0.002811665,0.004618183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04611247,0.0007203069,0.0009855935,0.00167568,0.00519268,0.006433163,0.002908637,0.002340038,0.0004890222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002518272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001550162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002063249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00266939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9872764,0.008182708,0.000523698,0.00168242,0.000862067,0.001472661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607874,0.02509495,0.005340599,0.004191089,0.002731864,0.001854011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002741971,0.0001633123,0.008984259,0.00009233299,0.0001247552,0.0001260469,0.0006849065,0.09577078,0.001536438,0.870388,0.001939327,0.01991559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003154204,0.00005067038,0.00168955,0.00002352895,0.00003026428,0.00005280329,0.0003446274,0.2581736,0.0004941684,0.7382869,0.0007908044,0.00003161842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6026022,0.0004372936,0.3740369,0.001842808,0.00006391291,0.0001501716,0.000251261,0.0001285535,0.02048679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811297,0.00007495168,0.01638661,0.00007201753,0.00005321068,0.00005778521,0.0001140761,0.00003427803,0.002077329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01205072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06373107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04292224798241957,"score_gpt":0.2466643740283857,"score_spread":0.2037421260459661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}