{"id":"W2104368193","doi":"10.1109/ccece.1999.808223","title":"A methodology for power system protection design based on an intelligent system approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Power Systems Fault Detection","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Electric power system; Process (computing); Computer science; Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Expert system; Power-system protection; Systems engineering; Systems design; Reliability engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Power (physics); Software engineering; Engineering; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004066988,0.001345201,0.0009591207,0.002131476,0.001315219,0.003261421,0.002870151,0.001793023,0.005848175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003644581,0.000844805,0.002317986,0.001424336,0.004384482,0.002942675,0.002243239,0.002663241,0.002154367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001961563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002453641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002849937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973411,0.0009561365,0.0002232316,0.0003611446,0.001011742,0.0001066179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985846,0.0007495793,0.00009205982,0.0002190847,0.0002961669,0.00005857635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001665956,0.00004438608,0.0001588873,0.0004419834,0.00005718798,0.0001774553,0.0006408957,0.0441696,0.001799848,0.850642,0.003995399,0.09785569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007259812,0.0001239706,0.0001353234,0.0004322427,0.00007885413,0.0003934481,0.0002047635,0.1127956,0.00223475,0.6504428,0.2330269,0.0000586833],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001500048,0.000174356,0.9961715,0.0001608971,0.00003630449,0.00006983887,0.00001343679,0.0001074941,0.003116184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0100546,0.0004594541,0.9867807,0.0001337396,0.00005102281,0.0003331771,0.00005762397,0.00005516944,0.002074525],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005848175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02150857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1005061441249589,"score_gpt":0.277074930261545,"score_spread":0.1765687861365862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}