{"id":"W2104500944","doi":"10.1139/x05-132","title":"Modeling early forest succession following clear-cutting in western Oregon","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Ecological succession; Range (aeronautics); Canopy; Stand development; Forestry; Geography; Western Hemlock; Vegetation (pathology); Clearcutting; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Pioneer species; Physical geography; Environmental science; Geology; Biology; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002874897,0.0001236886,0.0001965777,0.0005821569,0.0003773636,0.000116464,0.0006505224,0.000122747,0.0003855712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002597827,0.0001125687,0.00009871602,0.0005303132,0.0001845844,0.000749931,0.0001341855,0.0008098388,0.0003096713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009349301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002537857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03635046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8261007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976639,0.0001728254,0.0004546081,0.0002245628,0.000558547,0.0009255121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989665,0.00008421898,0.00007745151,0.0002080049,0.00004098453,0.000622874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002775552,0.00001973974,0.8441715,0.000005424928,0.000008980139,0.0005217321,0.0006001412,0.1502989,0.00001398684,0.0004921558,0.0004288649,0.003410866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007643165,0.0003113207,0.9654387,0.0001826503,0.000008432512,0.00004831913,0.0002992417,0.02310267,0.00002402886,0.003599226,0.006044157,0.0001769666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924904,0.0001181174,0.0004488805,0.001410251,0.0001867765,0.0001889822,6.893679e-7,0.000004800533,0.005151128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985983,0.00001420582,0.0005298066,0.0001024336,0.0001378369,0.000006296557,0.000001256971,0.00002126315,0.0005886415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7897503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9700665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03210972511904885,"score_gpt":0.304920070959551,"score_spread":0.2728103458405021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}