{"id":"W2104590900","doi":"10.1139/f01-201","title":"Ecological hypotheses for a historical reconstruction of upper trophic level biomass in the Baltic Sea and Skagerrak","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Council for the Exploration of the Sea; European Commission; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Sprat; Herring; Clupea; Fishery; Gadus; Capelin; Phoca; Biomass (ecology); Predation; Forage fish; Biology; Ecology; Fishing; Trophic cascade; Trophic level; Marine mammal; Predator; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009666925,0.0002780625,0.0002110959,0.002516205,0.001021097,0.001481122,0.0006635803,0.0005409304,0.004417019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002137465,0.0002648876,0.0002579044,0.001473079,0.001701404,0.001100665,0.0006586284,0.0004342847,0.0004992587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001099786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004652792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01142586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02593524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998109,0.00004614561,0.00001694915,0.00006740926,0.00002247268,0.00003617495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999173,0.000141984,0.0002844278,0.00006803741,0.0002148547,0.0001177057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001087115,0.00004220809,0.955459,0.00008408495,0.0001137994,0.0005438174,0.003359325,0.002506448,0.002348401,0.009298741,0.0006019665,0.02553342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000608283,0.00003298319,0.9901355,0.00003448463,0.00002204357,0.0001256858,0.002529257,0.002070832,0.00006424716,0.003464886,0.001502317,0.00001162227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878182,0.0005850656,0.001638258,0.0006122427,0.00002591338,0.0000106547,0.0002054306,0.00003448262,0.009069697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983192,0.0001659858,0.0007928755,0.00004041582,0.00001221453,0.00000758777,0.0002435351,0.000004203188,0.0004139194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02271867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07847032124980034,"score_gpt":0.2375427579985438,"score_spread":0.1590724367487434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}