{"id":"W2104601187","doi":"10.1017/s1744133111000156","title":"Empirically evaluating the impact of adjudicative tribunals in the health sector: context, challenges and opportunities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Economics Policy and Law","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; McMaster University; University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto","keywords":"Corporate governance; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Business; Action (physics); Empirical evidence; Process management; Empirical research; Risk analysis (engineering); Healthcare system; Public economics; Health care; Public relations; Management science; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3903052,0.001204034,0.00245233,0.006140154,0.006911742,0.01916951,0.006377911,0.008193849,0.007881955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6350005,0.0009522847,0.001844543,0.007901948,0.02332259,0.0267086,0.01503929,0.0106931,0.0005851935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0191251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03069051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008697848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01537617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5122517,0.4287697,0.01320079,0.00607932,0.02954134,0.01015719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2042966,0.7076988,0.03713795,0.01270114,0.03202236,0.006143113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001339958,0.004897968,0.1072451,0.003436488,0.001271875,0.0009165763,0.0133597,0.02669889,0.0005497633,0.6492559,0.009800987,0.1812269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001454556,0.007002586,0.09460952,0.01252278,0.001352277,0.0004298898,0.06792552,0.06155061,0.003299644,0.7160616,0.03329524,0.000495766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5784433,0.02078499,0.06882203,0.1546202,0.001688814,0.006535111,0.0006118753,0.0001228881,0.1683708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763238,0.001683673,0.01573886,0.003332106,0.0002746439,0.001292515,0.00007792398,0.00002085715,0.001255673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3903052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7518623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8130372477608475,"score_gpt":0.540760812731803,"score_spread":0.2722764350290445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}