{"id":"W2104724293","doi":"10.1002/ar.21165","title":"Quantitative Computed Tomography of Humpback Whale (<i>Megaptera novaeangliae</i>) Mandibles: Mechanical Implications for Rorqual Lunge‐Feeding","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Anatomical Record","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Humpback whale; Mandible (arthropod mouthpart); Anatomy; Quantitative computed tomography; Bone density; Computed tomography; Ossification; Whale; Biology; Skull; Tomography; Geology; Orthodontics; Medicine; Zoology; Fishery; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004302024,0.0001760817,0.0003042782,0.00003751363,0.0002223066,0.00002674362,0.000609152,0.0000822533,0.0006119952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000163436,0.0001286195,0.0002116113,0.0004324288,0.0003282135,0.0001266622,0.0004939608,0.000257041,0.00008521888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003900424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000883416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007639687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002836929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987059,0.00004443548,0.0003891075,0.0003539714,0.0001773683,0.0003291693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986748,0.0006245561,0.0001769251,0.0003752896,0.00004450359,0.0001039634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009616895,0.001027769,0.1851005,0.0001782258,0.0005091483,0.000002851901,0.001005367,0.00002919133,0.1762361,0.4331665,0.04037438,0.1614083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002996442,0.001935012,0.712392,0.0001168063,0.0004045767,0.00002774872,0.0008135883,0.0194087,0.0144232,0.1152864,0.1307392,0.001456301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890149,0.00005545778,0.003864597,0.0017002,0.0002183341,0.0006147545,0.00005112761,0.00005076811,0.004429863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822094,0.00005474051,0.01709958,0.0004095086,0.00006834137,0.00006839581,0.000009672367,0.00002090018,0.00005940601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5272915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6700918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03193009615379529,"score_gpt":0.2945936539368715,"score_spread":0.2626635577830763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}