{"id":"W2104728660","doi":"10.1002/wsb.520","title":"The estimation of grizzly bear density through hair‐snagging techniques above the tree line","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut","funders":"Nunavut Wildlife Management Board; Government of Nunavut","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Mark and recapture; Distance sampling; Sampling (signal processing); Geography; Population; Wildlife; Environmental science; Physical geography; Ecology; Statistics; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Mathematics; Demography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008856189,0.0002471869,0.0002082851,0.001035543,0.0003276671,0.0003506065,0.0006376784,0.000216496,0.0008809802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001484927,0.0002056365,0.0001753505,0.000448651,0.0003102506,0.0004169245,0.000350663,0.0001681638,0.0004018417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002857088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002001875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01755581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05157747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995499,0.0001307581,0.00001915597,0.0001233376,0.000140598,0.00003620219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984059,0.0003215034,0.0007548557,0.0001374415,0.0003110732,0.00006924413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007106926,0.0000348649,0.9487519,0.000044295,0.00005835214,0.00007989808,0.0003800715,0.0008273278,0.02623857,0.00005865672,0.0002065727,0.02324848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002107304,0.00005635952,0.9933256,0.000009550698,0.00001964051,0.0001427491,0.0001304731,0.002207266,0.003787657,0.00002509025,0.0002858916,0.000007714818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848369,0.0002144882,0.01306211,0.00001265172,0.000009122486,0.00003729878,0.0003123698,0.00007433328,0.001440606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912239,0.00009484563,0.008158683,0.00001658199,0.00001107108,0.00002213059,0.0001977777,0.000006184204,0.000268702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01755581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03490722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01548194244426735,"score_gpt":0.2361617380297437,"score_spread":0.2206797955854763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}