{"id":"W2104728660","doi":"10.1002/wsb.520","title":"The estimation of grizzly bear density through hair‐snagging techniques above the tree line","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut","funders":"Nunavut Wildlife Management Board; Government of Nunavut","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Mark and recapture; Distance sampling; Sampling (signal processing); Geography; Population; Wildlife; Environmental science; Physical geography; Ecology; Statistics; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Mathematics; Demography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001302622,0.000139067,0.0001430297,0.000004303378,0.0005343127,0.00003220539,0.000357106,0.0001409511,0.0001126943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000291942,0.00008834557,0.0001364024,0.0001872823,0.0006803551,0.0001123954,0.0002018541,0.0002477472,0.0002255739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001210086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003581355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004380179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001139434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987426,0.000146923,0.0002919045,0.00022533,0.0003459306,0.0002472443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990532,0.0002809112,0.0002187684,0.0003606069,0.00003648666,0.00005003238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004522617,0.00008564001,0.08541581,0.000007905969,0.00004478489,0.000001161527,0.00373876,0.001178472,0.0001354614,0.0008379022,0.8946476,0.0138613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009051756,0.0003176558,0.2886937,0.00006099309,0.0001149992,0.00002589088,0.004773609,0.01195437,0.003630428,0.01250706,0.6765082,0.0005079095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8007204,0.0001529652,0.01086688,0.1796247,0.0002873787,0.0006927084,0.000006177322,0.0002057253,0.007443117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588618,0.0001382668,0.02224835,0.01696469,0.0001790722,0.00006614449,0.00001431911,0.00002232175,0.001505024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2181393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4109555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01548194244426735,"score_gpt":0.2361617380297437,"score_spread":0.2206797955854763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}